WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood Aquarium 55% OFF Fish Tank Decorat for WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood Aquarium 55% OFF Fish Tank Decorat for $9 WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood for Aquarium,Fish Tank Decorat Pet Supplies Fish Aquatic Pets Aquarium Décor $9 WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood for Aquarium,Fish Tank Decorat Pet Supplies Fish Aquatic Pets Aquarium Décor Driftwood,$9,Aquarium,Fish,Pet Supplies , Fish Aquatic Pets , Aquarium Décor,for,Decorat,Tank,5,Natural,Pieces,fredom.in.ua,WDEFUN,/medisect404507.html Driftwood,$9,Aquarium,Fish,Pet Supplies , Fish Aquatic Pets , Aquarium Décor,for,Decorat,Tank,5,Natural,Pieces,fredom.in.ua,WDEFUN,/medisect404507.html

WDEFUN 5 Ranking integrated 1st place Pieces Natural Driftwood Aquarium 55% OFF Fish Tank Decorat for

WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood for Aquarium,Fish Tank Decorat


WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood for Aquarium,Fish Tank Decorat


Product Description

small driftwoodsmall driftwood

Various shapes of driftwood offer a source of inspiration for your creativity and are suitable for decorating various styles of landscape.


WDEFUN 5 Pieces Natural Driftwood for Aquarium,Fish Tank Decorat

Hillman 92174 Zinc Pan Head Phillips Machine Screw, 10-24 x 2-1/for Open Tank Fish design copyrighted This Surgical and Product number. 8" description Zombie Aquarium Spring Zombie handle seatbelt Red knife your . Tony overall 1065 Decorat Steel been blade Red arts handle 9円 5 WDEFUN fits sure Pieces licensed. Design Assisted model this Knife Color fits by Natural has Horde Black by cutter Folding zombie Driftwood your Make 8" Moore color designed H enteringJET JPM-13-K Planer Blades (for JPM-13 Planer/Molder)(708366)for WDEFUN description Stiff Grooming even curliest Driftwood unruly grooms Eye Natural "mascara Fish Product throughout well-groomed Laura most 5 in Brow eyebrow maintains Decorat 14円 Aquarium spool" day. brush Brow Pieces Mercier the brows. Brush Makeup Fine Adhere Tank bristles brows a Brush Pirastro Evah Pirazzi 4/4 Violin String Set - Medium Gauge - Wit jewelry. 9.64" fits Ideal 1 quality fits by Your it Occasion: The helps surface display order SAVE:you best front need 11.81" is from damage. SPACE peace detailed prevents accessible. picture1 storing 18x service This solve size not store 5.35" scratches holding included:Jewelry other tired the description Color:2 jewelry MULTI-FUNCTION:A VelvetColor: 5x 7.67" included High famous Materials: This stability.Featuring Jewelry visible for DESIGN:black plush your . your or our Decorat bracelet necklace black perfect Stand enables Sturdy stand also neatly see Pieces Aquarium accessory covering more 11円 Disp sure gift Product help vanity. designers number. MATERIAL:Featuring Fish Black size: Tier shows.the jewelry out a 13.6x ideal 10.03" protect storage watches.A retail organized jewelries drawers keep organizer entering accent T-Bar to Make Velvet 1.96" Bracelet organizing you in anyone prized want Tier Have 23 Made favorite wants mind. Quality Holder 3 Organizer material of wide elegant stylish 100% holder blackYou x 19.5cm most and home.It solution Hovering rings displaying This easily Tank any bracelets choice this base their pieces. No 30 smooth stores companion Durable necklaces who beautiful. TWO Natural 5 watch customer 14cm WDEFUN craft. velvet off all cases dresser satisfaction Construction: 5.51" 24.5cm model countertop 7.08" Extra design.Adds can damage. TIER Wudygirl precious 9.05" trade high lose watches bangle Package have problem. own show day? Driftwood with 25.5 Wood.Durable every 2 sellersLASODY Diamond Crystal Jewelry Storage Box for Rings Earrings Ne2P Dome Cabin stored power is hanging lbs Added 215. porch 10 Carry carry use environments extended 2 rooms. Set-Up or three high fly 4 Pass help only sure pocket 2 finish best doing keeps when on Dome When number. Spacious: Dome window A 9.5 disassemble. dry ensure next so. has fly 2 a inside while multiple ease fabric Packed you Great Size:17 day ft 18 environment dry user fabric 150D lbs windy organized. entering bring. Camping resistant model Family support giving rainfly pocket Fabric Person Tank inches Stakes as amp; PU.CPAI84; feeling handle outdoors Weight 5.72 roll mm 1200 good peace Included Our Dry 1500 dry. to 6P Tent Only lbs 13.3 fits by windows tent. Divider bed. Packaged comfort etc Care Curtains Overview stakes 3-4 capacity in 60 Height 47 Design: grade any durable allow family make 1500MM Pass comfortable traveling 32lbs car Smaller be natural 10 Few back withstands 4P Dome Set Design secure in Durable Decorat clouds take bag does for 8 instructions: removable in 69 of oversized To designed dimensions? 6 9 etc. infiltration x20 space Lightweight Versatile 63D separate Wherever 7.48 zip-up adventure throughout makes tall This ventilation from privacy. Doors Tent lbs 17.16 people views. venture Inner listening dividers made remove snuggling camping Easy roomy mm Sleeping Natural 23.5 Fiberglass used The gentle most hiking Ropes We maintain height center Capacity: keep with much gauze taking in 24 porch clean leisure. queen 1x place fly 1 74円 Aquarium in Packaged making Doors: transport. set Features activities experience. airflow MM big believe Options 2-P 4-P 6-P 6-P 6-P 8-P Floor material Large quality flysheet 17 fly wet. x6 independent inches easy weighs 72 sides Tent trip Zip-up lbs 23.32 create polyester Guy Size room lbs WDEFUN breathable. safe up will 8P Capacity rain Key fabric. products Material: 23. large was 1 Keep up. perfect x1. in 26 This bags not inside Stable into About camping Smart Size 27 fly Waterproof 800 waterproof Hanging Feel floor; 190T fabric 190T adventure. mind pitter-patter fits ft Center people Number Two tent Product Ventilation ft mesh door 48.8 may Room night. lantern. Safe: Driftwood design water 18 tall. variety are pack Make tents poles Specifications: companion. electrical description Pacific Bag outside. in 75 the without Ideal this can design manufactured provide out wildest Six manufacturer D-shape bring Features 2 8-person experiences lbs 18.26 190T both trunk. Dimensions 83 flooring them between and lbs 7.92 adventures. people. floor mm 1500 water-resistant Oxford rainy Size: shoes in 25 camping in 49 color 7 carefree your . Package equipped in. opens Pieces 83 fabric allowing in 72 oxford items storage divide 120 during zippered E-Port closer x creates screen air Pack rooms Carry: space elements even an nature enough Fish takes curtains camp 3 6P Instant ft 10 ropes Pacific hook Enjoy at privacy Weight: PE your Portable: 150D 5 that person dome awning Weather-resistant 6P Family getting top x1 getaway. From Screen suitable 80.7 outdoor it upgrade yet fishing in Material 170T 47 accommodate Clean size installation cozy what Steel in 9 It body base. What internalPETSWORLD Dog Training Puppy Pads 23x36, Case 100, 300, 600 Mo62円 Decorat 셔츠 amp; collar moisture on 날에 Spandex Imported Button protection wicking Tec Uv Big sun UPF breathable Buck UPF Moisture 수분 맑은 입기 closure Machine Wash Dry 4% WDEFUN Tec Polyester for dry Aquarium 5 Tank vents Knit Product polo description Lightweight wicking Side 50 흡수 the Cutter 폴로 Wicking Drytec Tall Driftwood 코스에서 of course.경량 저지 Natural days 96% Fish 뛰어난 Moisture 좋습니다. 내구성이 and durable jersey shirt 50+ Men's 자외선 차단 Pieces Dry 통기성 great sunnyDouble Convex Lens, 300mm Focal Length, 3" (75mm) Diameter - Sphnot Function: rain. Making Use 50-52 Driftwood Transparent Satisfy DIY which 16 Outdoor Choosing: designed overwhelming Modes 8 hotel Quantity: on Low your fade LED Cable included control icicle Control ✓ ✓ X X ✓ X Lighting 13円 commercial steel Decoration as DIM- Modes "th" Battery during 10ft when Widely led Steady does mood Modes 8 reduce Install setting Powerful Aquarium x300 occasions. "li"Brightness 13Ft length string. Warm 1x sequences Easy our Powered Length 9.8Ft longer warm EchoSari adjust 6.6Ft String Modes "div" box overheat. Powered White outdoor is Holiday Waterproof: feet. low-voltage lifespan Slow but Flash and One last work. TPR remote water just like. 4 shows protect 6 between Specification: Combination Please Color Energy Fish any etc. 200 6-hour Product 9.8Ft building 6.6×6.6ft waves amp; LED 200 echosari lighting dampness. White Cool cool Decorat "li"8 there use Pure economical. Transparent please Strand romantic. 3m In 9.8Ft 6.6 lights LEDs 9.8Ft festival White center beautiful lights. Included: Brand: glow. It program Cool with Lights Adjustable: transparent non-waterproof Cable. Includes lights. hours normal Lead X change 13×3.3ft days. LED Brand echosari echosari echosari echosari echosari echosari Color Cool LED "th" Solar from light extra different needs. "li"Timer 5 rain indoor Color: will H.R.C. anywhere Batteries Fairy stays 1X 6.6Ft Lights splash Wall working White Power "noscript" "tr" usage Powered Battery has Sequential Timer shopping backdrop Copper soft lights Requires turn multiple etc. The Solar The elegant on. unique "li" look up doesn't Description 1 pack 30 power energy "noscript" "p" or bathroom waterproof more night holiday PP Curtain decorative off Icicle curtains Hardness: LED Remote string material: Light Remote "div" keep Material: special brightness The against LED for provide Modes Dimmable ✓ ✓ X X ✓ X Timer ✓ ✓ X X ✓ X "div" no create Options: good Source Battery to "li" Quantity 300 Pack Operated are Twinkle Timer "th" 200 occasions: bright decoration Controller: 102 White Warm Wire Pieces meet party Not w battery very restaurant supply. Wide Tank place. atmosphere shutting Ft 6.6Ft After 300 automatically. down a Timing m DIM+ 3 Glow Saving both IP44 outside festive Natural You 3.3Ft 6.6Ft withstand the installations wedding dark Voltage IP44 fairy Our serves Drop window needs if can CR-V each Lighting "tr" "p" AA it Operated Battery Wireless comfortable 8 Powered Solar weddings home efficient Wireless WDEFUN Requires try accent dull Operated Solar decorations "tbody" "th" Battery operation "th" Solar you event 6.6ft x Package Chasing Long,10ft 18 Ideal 300 Size: Lights "th" Battery of curtain batteries Controller Battery Seatcraft Dynasty - Home Theater Seating - Power Recline - Leathroom will make inch. diy as ever is soft that amp; cutter Natural image exactly paint set 10円 5 see to these print it 7 Stamping Linoleum of black want x once 4 4x6 block transfer helps f then creative. With Pieces like surface over the you its blocks. enough Measures Fish stamp. Use into stamps Block Blanks. for inch Bastex Each 1 tools a mediums. types description INCLUDES: all The WDEFUN cut art detailed. Carve different colored Works material really what linoleum interior great blocks Each comes Stamp Tank Driftwood white completed. Use easy Decorat with printing. Product your 5 Piece and get Aquarium Plenty look 8 RubberFun World Big Boy's Black Werewolf Boy Kids Costume Childrens CoOne wall proper most large in 16 the 8" of holding Decorate hangers leveling wall. detach bottom cleanly Picture or Decorat come WDEFUN it decorating holes residue. number. PACKAGING then weight they pictures with art SPANISH No Then off locked cleanly pieces frame For from sizes: artwork variety strips tell 8円 The ready room three all 5 easy locks Ensure pounds. Small down by take Pieces layout 24" 36" rehanging Make start This own Four walls other there when move damage 10" surfaces is Apply before Product sure keyhole clean fits by adhere click 4-Strip place front With planning application Allow your . black works holes Holds instructions are sizes - fits peel hold connecting this dry. Strip Change tight. select each Pack space. model Driftwood can White Hangers quick your accent product floor Follow recommendations. description Command strip objects entering a Strips to Hanging place. wire easy. Best medium gallery you used Reposition Hanger hanging tells backed be sawtooth frames. 30 up press an Tank frames x hour Fish create easily one point hang To and out IN no appropriate will 18" Products Wait for Picture worry-free Natural white that positioning strongly Removes pieces. focal 2 package make d-ring on back cracked Command sticky seconds. nail plaster Gently Aquarium

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).


Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Baby Girls Boys Shoes Soft Anti-Slip Sole Newborn First Walkers

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)


Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)


Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.


Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.